For the reasons listed above? Sandboxing issues, Apple control over update timeframes, the risk of the app being rejected at any time, … ?
Because Google controls Chrome, top to bottom, and they control Google Docs, top to bottom. That, and the fact that people specifically have cited in this thread (and elsewhere on the Internet) the fact that Google Docs does very well in Chrome, and not so well in Safari. This would logically be because Apple isn’t making security/performance decisions with Google Docs in mind.
Regarding the money, Google is paying them to be the default search engine, and as far as I’m aware that’s only on iOS. So the payment is for a completely different thing, on a completely different platform.
The same thing is true of Firefox. Google is buying the “default search engine” privilege - not Firefox re-coding their browser to optimize for Google’s other business divisions.
Because, hypothetically, you want to get all of your software from the Mac App Store? Lars mentioned that he wishes LibreOffice was in the MAS, and it is - just not a free version. Probably because the open source people behind LibreOffice don’t want the extra hassles App Store inclusion would bring for their free app. I wouldn’t download the paid version, but the availability of LibreOffice was brought up - so I noted that there’s a version available.
To borrow an excellent summary from the Apple forums regarding Malwarebytes:
As for why it’s not in the App Store, that’s because the restrictions placed on App Store apps would neuter its functionality, crippling it beyond any usefulness. Any antivirus in the App Store should be viewed with suspicion. There are a lot of scam apps in there, and those that are legit are still hamstrung by the restrictions.
The App Store’s security / sandboxing model limits what software can do. A really good antivirus needs a lot more access to your computer than what that model allows - so it’s not in the MAS because it’s actually to your benefit that they don’t make it compliant.