Curated news app

I do it somewhat similar. RSS for tech/science interests and irregular blogs of developers I like.

For general news, I have a daily newsletter mail of our local but quite good newspaper. That is also funnelled into RSS via kill-the-newsletter.com. Works like a charm with Reeder automatic reading mode enabled! This helps me to keep up with local and some national/global news.

Apart from, I have the app of Tagesschau, which is a German public news similar to BBC news. It gives me the headlines with some mute video in the background and I can click to get a longer article on the topic. This is for more global news.

Artifact app says goodbye.

https://artifact.news

2 Likes

Anyone use UpNext? I’ve tried it in the past and liked it but never stuck with it because I was caught in the process of trying every reading app and bouncing between them all without a home. Just downloaded it again to see if I like it more this time, because I noticed it’s made by the people behind Mailbrew (which I also just made my first daily brew with!)

No recommendation from me (I don’t use any news apps) but am intrigued by the notion of “curated news” as my partner is a curator — a real one in a museum. I see the word used outside of that context seemingly as a way to posh-up the idea of collect or collate. What exactly does “curated news app” mean.

Personally I check reliable and trustworthy news media sources directly and being in the UK want non-parochial coverage of news and events. The sources have specific biases in their approach to reporting. Amongst those I check The Guardian is sort centre-left, the Independent is sort of centre-right/right, the i is much further right and BBC News which is despite the UK government’s attempts to use it for pushing their propaganda is centrist favouring neither right-wing nor left-wing politics. Taken together they provide balanced reporting. The one UK newspaper/media outlet I put no trust in is The Daily Mail and agree with the WikiPedia judgement that it is an untrustworthy source — unless one is look for salacious news on z-list celebrities and general muck-raking.

But all that gets me no nearer to understanding what “curated news app” means.

1 Like

You have never opened Apple News or read about how it works?

It tries to find stories for your interests and your location. Either by you telling it what you are interested in, liking articles, or tracking your internet usage.

Have you looked at Omnivore? No subscription.

I have, but I love the UI of UpNext and somehow have a full lifetime subscription already.

I have unfortunately opened Apple News and seriously “found it wanting”. Also read Apple’s user guide for it and similarly not been impressed. The fundamental idea behind it seems to be the algorihtmic version of Hollywood’s more-of-the-same principle; it earned millions at the box office so let’s make 100 more identical versions.

I have the same issue with Facebook and Instagram which offer me “top stories” rather than “most recent”. On Farcebook I use FBP to force most recent as my default and even then they curate away posts from family and friends because Meta does not consider them worthy of my attention — whereas my prinicple use of Farcebook is expressly to keep in contact with friends and family!

I want to decide what “top stories” are and invariably these are not what ad-promoting junk is deemed to be important. Through Farcebooks presumption of what I want I have missed death notices of several friends and old business colleagues.

“Curated” news apps, including Apple News, fall in to the same hole of second guessing what my interests are. All very Newspeak-ian in approach.

1 Like

As the OP, when I said “curated news” I did not intend it to sound as you said ‘new speakian’. However, news has not come to us in traditional publications without considerable bias in many years. I think what I’m seeking is something that can use an algorithm that I guide - something like the Apple News approach, without sending me a lot of crap I’m not looking for. Meaning, I either have no interest or no political leaning toward the story being sent…does this make sense? LOL, maybe it’s more of a societal complaint.

As far as non-biased news sources go, your two best bets are going to be Reuters and AP News. Most of the news a vast majority of the population consumes, like CNN, Fox News, NY Times, you name it, are news outlets, not news sources.

Reuters and AP have thousands of journalists around the world reporting on breaking news the moment they happen and strive to deliver just the facts of the situations without bias, though of course any given topic could be considered biased depending on what your views are. Generally speaking, however, they do a pretty damn good job at keeping opinions out of their reporting.

The way CNN, Fox, etc., get most of their news is through paid newswires provided by Reuters and AP, sending the news directly to the outlets who then write their pieces on it, potentially adding additional information for context and any bias the news outlet may adhere to. CNN will often lean left, Fox News right, etc., and this will visibly reflect on their reporting because that is what their subscribers expect and want to read/hear while also being (for the most part) accurate.

The problem with your initial question in this context is that almost every news app I’ve ever used has been atrocious, both in UI and UX. I’m talking about news apps from the publications themselves, like the Reuters and AP official apps, not apps like Flipboard or Apple News, which I think mostly excel in the UI/UX department.

What I’ve tried in the past is using RSS for these, but the inherent problem is that there are so many news reports every day from these sources, and RSS does not typically have an option for sorting by something like “top news”. I think Feedly has something like that for popular RSS feeds, but then we hit problem #2 with this solution: neither AP nor Reuters offer RSS feeds anymore.

It’s a pain in the ass trying to get RSS feeds for both of them. They used to offer feeds, but now that everyone realizes that this circumvents the viewing of advertisements, they’ve essentially shuttered any way to grab just the text and images of news articles as they’re posted. I’ve tried every solution around, from FiveFilters’ Feed Creator to the many open source web scrapers available on Github, and the best I’ve found is a small site called PolitePol, to which I have no affiliation.

The results on PolitePol seem vastly superior to FiveFilters and others, and it was relatively painless to set up, though some feeds I tried required manually selecting CSS/HTML elements for the headlines and body text. Once you set them up though, they work great. Keep in mind that most of these RSS feed creation services will cost money, and PolitePol offers 20 feeds (without images) for free, but I chose the $10 plan for 50 feeds with images and a faster refresh rate. Not trying to advocate for any one service, this has just been my experience.

Yet after all of this, we still have the problem of RSS not sorting by Top News. I get very overwhelmed seeing hundreds of unread articles in my RSS reader, and quickly going through headlines is a slog sometimes, but it does work if you want it to.

The real problem lies with how awful these official news source/outlet apps are. I would gladly resubscribe to Apple News+ if it meant no giant ads between articles even for paying subscribers, but that’s unfortunately not an option at this time. The UI is fantastic, but these gigantic ads ruin the experience entirely in my opinion.

So, for me personally, I do a mix of RSS, occasional visits to Apple News, and visiting the news source’s direct website every so often to see the bigger picture. I apologize for such an incredibly long reply to this for a pretty basic point about biases lol, but hey, might as well post this since I typed it all out already.

5 Likes

This sounds similar to me. Hate ads and click bait so I go RSS. Then I get overwhelmed with RSS feeds to I try Apple News again. Then the giant ads drive me nuts.

The circle just repeats.

2 Likes

Every time I try to follow any “news” source (really anything from any large media company) my RSS feed gets spammed with articles. They all seem to be a firehose of articles, and more than a few I have followed in the past will rebroadcast articles from previous days. So I gave up. My RSS feed is small publisher type stuff or blogs, otherwise it gets out of control fast.

With the election season beginning in the US, it’s time to cut all “news” out of my life anyway. :stuck_out_tongue:

I’m some similar tendencies. Daily front page page glance at a couple major news outlets. Deeper read on weekly/monthly sources. RSS for a bunch of small sites that publish irregularly. This is stable and sustainable.

If I don’t read enough books and less frequent periodicals, I get antsy and start trying to set up higher volume daily feeds, which is unsustainable. It’s similar to how I start eating more snacks if I don’t eat enough soup and vegetables each week.

Indeed!! In fact, I go as far as to mute political ads that appear on TV; my phone is set to block anyone not in my contacts, and with the exception of a few pre-selected sources, e.g., WSJ, The Atlantic et al, I don’t read political news-it is always about the “horse race” rather than the substance of the issues.

We do most of our sports viewing on DVR delay, and fast forward through all the commercials! It is especially effect strategy during an election year.

Of course having friends and family texting about the game can be an issue …

1 Like

I do that as well! It spends up watching the games significantly and I get to skip ALL commercials, not just political ones. :slightly_smiling_face: I’ve told my staff not to mention sports scores in baseball, NFL, or college football to me anytime during their seasons. :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like