I am trying to find a better workflow for reading/archive/research. Currently all RSS feeds are in Feedly, articles I want to read later are sent to Pocket. Articles in Pocket that I want to keep long term are sent to DevonThink. I have trouble with this last part, I feel like something is getting lost in the process.
Is there a better way to do this? Would the incorporation of Craft help or complicate the situation?
Example Topics to give some ideas. I have a bunch of links (article or youtube) for setting up a new Synology, or a new UniFi network, itās not always tech. Sometimes, itās types of fruits or vegetables I am researching in terms of gardening time, fertilizer, pruning seasons, etc. (I am trying to give you the variety of topics that come up)
Anyone else have these use case scenarios? This is just for stuff from RSSā¦I havenāt even touched āwritingā yet LOL. I am still keeping that in Drafts and Ulysses for now.
Itās sounding good to me, honestly. Whatās troubling you about the last part? Are you building on a successful use of DevonThink or trying something new with this?
As an experiment, you might consider what it would be like to only use Pocket (finding old articles from its archives) or to save articles straight to DT from RSS and read them in DT. Iām not saying you should do either one, but when I think about those extremes it helps me understand what each software might do for me in this workflow.
āArticles in Pocket that I want to keep long term are sent to DevonThink. I have trouble with this last part, I feel like something is getting lost in the process.ā
Could it be that paywalled articles which Pocket can retrieve are getting cut off in DT? You might consider Instapaper instead, as it can send the full text of an article, not just a link. Also, Instapaper can export all your highlights from a given page and export that together as well, something Pocket canāt do. (At least not the last time I looked.)
I tried using the Archives feature in Pocket and found it very limiting. Savings articles straight to DT from RSS was too much and didnāt offer that clean look from Pocket. Just to elaborate on why the DT-RSS combo was too much. There are about 25-30 RSS Feeds that I follow in Feedly, I utilize Feedly in the sense of itās just a placeholder and I filter out what I want to read and save to Pocket. Pocket gives that clean no-ad look.
@luhmann I think at times I forget DT exists in the sense of usability. It turns into my ādump and archive digital cabinetā. I used to write in DT and present from DT (that was never a good experience) Later, I had a struggle with my writing (for a while I would export my writing to DT as a āfinal resting placeā). Ultimately, I just decided that since I write in Ulysses (I write my sermons and talks for church service), I would just leave and organize in Ulysses. The drawback to this is I lose out on any type of connections between sermons.
I use Pocket (with context based tags) and archive when read. If I want to keep an article longer-term, I clip it from Pocket to Evernote as a simplified article before archiving.
My actual workflow for reading stuff from the internet is:
Input: RSS feeds (in Reeder with backend Inoreader) + anything form the web (Safari and everything that has a share sheet) I want to read later / process / keep.
Reading later queue: Read Later with Reeder (Reeder read later "serviceā); it allows tagging so things may get tagged.
Read things: when read they may
be converted in a text file with nb to later be processed in the Obsidian Vault (which iāve not decided if I will index in Devonthink)
be stored in Raindrop.io as a permanent archive (previously used pinboard but wanted to change after increase in price and⦠well just wanted to test something new)
well, the main advantage of Obsidian is the GUI, and the link suggestion (unlinked mentions) feature.
I can work my way around command line but Iām not so expert.
Apart from that, when I started using nb it did not support wikilinks, if I recall correctly (it is very actively developed tho, and itās a great little utility).
I should mention that Obsidian is a recent addition to the workflow. And to edit / interact with notes I use emacs with markdown mode and deft on the Mac and 1writer on iOS.
Iāve started to use Obsidian to see if it helps with connecting things, and if it makes easier to add to the vault the articles I convert to plain text with nb on top of āhand writtenā notes.
I had a very similar workflow. Feedly ā Pocket ā DT. The problem was getting the articles from Pocket to DT.
Now I accomplish this via Instapaper
Feedly ā Instapaper ā DT
Instapaper has a nice RSS feature . The cleaned up articles appear as PDF in DT as an RSS Feed.
I then process the articles and summarize/take notes in Obsidian with links into DT
This process is working well for me.