”Majorly important”—At least it wasn’t written by AI

Am I imagining this, or has the quality of popular journal writing noticeably declined? I don’t mean to sound curmudgeonly, but “majorly important” makes me cringe—like fingernails on a chalkboard.

Where are the editors? I suppose the good news is that this piece wasn’t written by AI. :slightly_smiling_face:

Here are some other examples from the article, along with my suggested revisions:

  • “who loves some dramatic verbiage.”
    Revision: “Who are known for dramatic phrasing.”

  • “The overwhelm has employees totally ‘crashing out.’”
    Revision: “The pressure has employees ‘crashing out.’” [“Totally” is redundant and, at least historically, would be considered inappropriate in most editorial contexts.]

  • “Think their dog eating their new Nike kicks.”
    Revision: “Think their dog chewing up or destroying new Nike kicks.” [Dogs don’t eat shoes.]

  • “The videos are very often all in good fun and usually hilarious.”
    Revision: “The videos are often lighthearted and usually hilarious.” [“Very” is an overused, weak intensifying adverb.]

  • “That doesn’t mean that work-related pressure isn’t a very real issue.”
    Revision: “That doesn’t mean work pressure isn’t a troubling and growing issue.”

I suspect speed has replaced quality as the prevailing standard in modern journalism.

I’ll feel better after I have my coffee. :rofl::coffee:

3 Likes

Your phrasing comes across as academic, which I suspect is not the author’s intended tone. It’s a pop-culture site, not an academic journal.

Back to my coffee. :slight_smile:

1 Like

I mean, it’s Fast Company, not The Journal of Applied Psychology. The author—who, if you follow the link to her other articles, is more than capable of writing “correct” prose—has chosen to write this piece in the colloquial register of her TikTok-ing subjects, perhaps with a wink to the rest of us.

No disrespect, but your re-write is the kind of prose I might expect from an AI.

I asked Claude to re-write the article in a style appropriate to a respected newspaper or magazine. Here is what Claude suggested:

Here’s a revised version in neutral journalistic style:

Work-Related Stress Drives Employee “Burnout” Behaviors

Workplace stress continues to increase, with employees expressing frustration through behaviors that Generation Z has termed “crashing out” — responses ranging from visible emotional outbursts to internal feelings of being overwhelmed. These reactions can manifest as workplace confrontations, crying at work stations, or private moments of distress.

The term has gained traction on social media platforms like TikTok, where users document stress responses to both significant and minor workplace issues. While often presented in a humorous context online, the underlying work-related pressures represent genuine concerns supported by recent research.

According to Owl Lab’s 2024 State of Hybrid Work Report, which surveyed 2,000 full-time employees, 43% of workers report increased work stress within the past year. Additionally, 89% indicate no improvement in work-related stress compared to the previous year.

Primary Sources of Workplace Stress

Compensation Concerns
Twenty-two percent of workers report feeling inadequately compensated, according to the study. This has led to increased “polyworking,” with 22% of employees maintaining additional employment beyond their full-time positions. The trend is more pronounced among managers, with 32% holding secondary jobs. The report indicates managers experience stress levels 55% higher than non-management employees.

Remote Work Flexibility
Employee preferences for remote work stem partly from perceived inefficiency of office requirements. Half of surveyed workers believe mandatory office attendance serves only to “fill a seat” rather than accomplish necessary tasks.

Remote work offers practical benefits: 84% of workers report improved meal options when working from home, while hybrid workers spend an average of $61 more on workdays requiring office attendance compared to home-based work days.

The importance of flexible arrangements is reflected in employee retention concerns, with 41% indicating they would seek new employment if hybrid work options were eliminated.

Workplace Political Climate
Political differences among colleagues contribute to office avoidance, with 45% of U.S. workers citing colleagues’ political views as a factor in preferring remote work.

Generational differences appear in responses to workplace dissatisfaction. While older employees less frequently share grievances publicly, 34% of all workers have posted negative content about their employers online. This figure rises to 48% among Generation Z employees.

Research Considerations
Further investigation might examine long-term impacts of increased workplace stress, effectiveness of various stress-reduction interventions, and correlations between remote work policies and employee retention rates across different industries and organizational structures.

It’s clear, it’s fine—but it isn’t as much fun.

That’s Fast Company; like Variety, they have their own somewhat odd and very colloquial style. See “Ditch the digital notes.”
Verbiage connotes excessiveness; it has negative connotations.
Overwhelm has more emotional connotations than “pressure.”
Totally is colloquial; so is Fast Company’s general style.
My brother’s Malamute ate hiking boots, except the metal eyelets, and the rubber soles. Didn’t even make the dog sick. (Made my brother feel terrible.)
Very often is funtioning as it should; very often means they are in good fun more often than just often suggests.
“A very real issue” does not mean the same thing as “troubling and growing.” “A real issue is a much more neutral statement.”

These “journalists” need to get off our lawns!

Anyway, language is dynamic, always changing. Nothing new here.

2 Likes

In the same vein, I think that inexperienced and cheaper people are being used to write articles.

2 Likes

They are [hiring](https://www.paycomonline.net/v4/ats/web.php/jobs/ViewJobDetails?job=282061

Behold, thou speaketh truth.

That’s scary. I sure hope I don’t write like AI! :slightly_smiling_face:

That said, I once wrote an article, 100% my writing, and then tried three AI detectors as a test. Each of them falsely claimed my text was 70-80% likely AI. I’m not sure that is a good thing! :slightly_smiling_face: I sent the results to my academic team and warned them against using such detectors as “proof” of student cheating.

To the extent that my writing is somehow similar to AI, that may be a reflection of having done far too much academic-style writing over 40 years. :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

I don’t think AI writing is categorically bad just because it’s often neutral and appropriate for, say, a textbook. The best prose stylists write lucidly, but with a genuine voice that puts some “there there,” so to speak. Sometimes a neutral register unprovoked by personality is exactly what’s called for, though—and writing it is harder than it looks.

1 Like

**[quote=“Bmosbacker, post:9, topic:41190, full:true”]
To the extent that my writing is somehow similar to AI, that may be a reflection of having done far too much academic-style writing over 40 years. :slightly_smiling_face:
[/quote]

The solution is to have LLMs trained on modern journalists output, then you won’t be matching AI anymore. :grinning:

1 Like