The picture under “In the Box” shows a power cord connected to the Studio Display.
This actually brings up an interesting question: the circular power cord connection in the picture looks similar to the one in the 24" iMac. Similar to the iMac, this looks like may be too thin for a conventional plug. I wonder if we’ll get another magnetic power cable?
The tech specs say that it has 96W upstream charging, so it’s not Thunderbolt powered.
The specs also say 100-240V AC.
I think they just didn’t mention the power cord.
Right. It outputs as much power as the most powerful charger Apple sells. It was specifically mentioned somewhere that you can use it to charge your laptop in the same Thunderbolt cable used to transfer video. Therefore, the display cannot be powered by the computer. The power goes the other way. So it absolutely needs to be plugged in to the wall (mains power), which would be the 100-240V AC spec. Of course, that doesn’t tell us if a power cord is in the box, only that one is required to provide power to it.
Maybe those Apple Sales support folks will watch the Youtube videos.
They were pleasant folks doing their best but at least 3 of them tried to convince me that the Studio Display was powered by the Thunderbolt cable that’s listed under “What’s In The Box”.
It turns out that the power cable is permanently attached to the display (see Ars Technica’s review; scroll down to “The Bad” at the bottom). Presumably the list of contents would only list individual separate components. As the power cable is not a separate component, it’s not listed.