And expensive. Which, by itself, would probably explain the lack of interest.
Plus, there’s a lot of behind-the-scenes protocol stuff to make computer-to-“world” Ethernet work properly that I’m not even sure Thunderbolt has.
The only thing I can find about multi-computer Thunderbolt networks seems to indicate that the computers are daisy-chained, with the intermediate computers using two Thunderbolt ports - one in, one out - as a network bridge.
It would be awesome for sure, but is there a real need for such bandwidth over two computers for long term? I doubt, you might need it for initial file transfer, but for day to day operation, I don’t think that is a common use case.
A 40 Gbit/s network is absolutely useful but Thunderbolt has really stringent length limits (3m without a fibre optic cable) that kinda limit its utility.
Also, 40GbE exists (with adaptors available from Thunderbolt) so that’s probably what anyone who actually needed that much bandwidth would use.
If you can get Thunderbolt to 40gbE, logically there’s no reason you can’t run them through a 40gbE switch. But you’re going to spend a small fortune on this project.
What’s the use case you’re trying to optimize here for, other than “cool”?
Yeah, you’d be much better off looking at an upgrade to 10GbE, which is something some consumers do use; use cases for 40GbE are generally “the faster transfers will easily save/earn me the cost of that adaptor”.