Nice! Itās neat how these tools are letting so many more people help themselves, and quickly.
Can it help me create Shortcuts? That would be awesome!
Probably! Itās text-based instructions, but it seems to know the names and uses of many of the actions after asking it a few things.
That would be a great first-party use of this tech, built directly into Shortcuts.
I found it helpful to point ChatGPT to documentation and examples.
Agreed, this would be a great way for Apple to incorporate AI.
Boy, does Siri need help! Yesterday, I tried four different ways to get Siri to tell me the official time (Central) when spring begins. The closest I could get was the day. One would think this would be an easy thing for Siri to do. ChatGPT-4 was able to provide the information instantly: ā In 2024, spring begins with the vernal equinox on Wednesday, March 20th, at 4:06 AM Central Time (CT).ā
It can indeed. Itās helped me navigate some of the less familiar Shortcuts Actions like āRepeat with Eachā, āSplit Textā, etc. Typically I would explain what I wanted to do and then upload a screenshot of how I had started working on the Shortcut, and then it would tell me the next steps. Occasionally the suggestions havenāt worked, but when I indicated that, ChatGPT would suggest a workaround. Very handy.
It seems ChatGPT-4 was a bit confused.
In the Eastern time zone, the correct time is 11:06 pm on March 19th. Which would be 10:06 pm Central time I believe.
ChatGPT, providing instant disinformation!
Full Disclosure, we have just started using MS Github Copilot where I work. It can be scary good at times. And also make obvious rookie mistakes. Used correctly it can be quite useful.
What I typically do is explain to ChatGPT what I am trying to accomplish in Drafts, provide input/out examples, and then take an existing action, copy the code, paste it into ChatGPT, and indicate that Action does something similar. Itās been really handy for creating all kinds of text editing actions specific to my needs.
Iām guessing you wonāt like the output for URLs that contain a port number in the hostname (but you can fix that by improving your āpromptsā once more).
Who would you blame for this? Yourself or ChatGPT? (Just curious)
Thatās similar to my approach. Iāve found I can just give ChatGPT the URL to an existing action and it figures out the rest.
I was about to point this out but @MevetS beat me to it by a day.
You always, always need to verify information you get from ChatGPT. Itās often if not generally wrong, and will absolutely just straight up fabricate things like sources and quotes.
Because thatās literally what itās designed to do.
I agree that itās always important to check ChatGPT for accuracy. I once asked it to tell me about Chaim Potokās In the Beginning, and it told me Potok didnāt write such a book. Um, Iāve only been teaching said novel for a decade!
In this case, though, I wonder if part of the discrepancy might have to do with location, since the time of the equinox varies by latitude as well as time zone. (Disclosure: I havenāt checked.)
I am (or rather was since Iām now retired) a programmer. Occasionally ChatGPT is of use in kick-starting my use of a programming language I have little experience with ā such as in the R statistical system ā except that ChatGPT gets many things wrong. It omits to mention environmental setup or uses a function that does not work or it ignores a much simpler solution found via human assistants. Most useful as a natural language interface to the web-as-corpus but even then results need to be tested.
I asked Perplexity to tell me about Mitch Wagner. It said Iām a technology journalist and editor, CrossFit athlete and prominent San Diego attorney.
All of those things are trueāof three different people, all of whom happened to be named āMitch Wagner.ā
I know Drafts Actions are relatively simple, but as a nonprogrammer Iād be very leery of asking an AI to generate code I donāt have the skills to review.
That seems considerably riskier than, say, using open source packages from GitHub that arenāt signed by Apple, because then thereās at least some chance an unaffiliated programmer will review the code and raise a flag if thereās an issue.
See AI bots hallucinate software packages and devs download them ā¢ The Register