I’ve decided to replace my aging mid-2011 MacBook Air with a new Mac Mini.
My Typical Computer Uses:
Email, Internet, Slack
Burn DVDs with MDRP (Mac DVD Ripper Pro) and encode with Handbrake
Would like to do some light photo editing in the future, possible with something like Affinity Pro or similar
Destination for scanner
In the future, if and when my Synology dies it would probably be my Plex server, too
I’m pretty sure the configuration below should suit my needs and ‘future-proof’ me a bit. I don’t expect my future needs to change much from what I’m doing now, other than maybe light family video editing but that’s probably iffy at best. The only thing I’m not sure about is if I need the i7 processor and if I have enough RAM.
Mac Mini - $1,499:
3.0GHz 6‑core 8th‑generation Intel Core i5 (Turbo Boost up to 4.1GHz)
16GB 2666MHz DDR4
512TB SSD storage
I like what you put together and think the i7 processor would be overkill for your setup.
My 2018 Mac mini is the stock 3.0ghz with 8gb of RAM and 256SSD. I also added a LaCie 20tb 2Big Dock for storage in a Raid1 configuration. I’ll bump the RAM up in the near future.
What Optical Disc Drive are you using for burning DVDs???
I have a SuperDrive but some CD and DVD discs I borrow from the Library have anti-theft stickers on them and snag in the ODD. Considering a tray loading Blu-Ray drive…
If I were getting a mini to use as a desktop the i5 and 16gb of RAM are what I’d get. You don’t really describe your storage needs or what (if any) external storage you’ll be using, so it’s hard to tell if the 512gb SSD would be too much, not enough, or just right.
My last Mac mini was a 2011 model, so I keep computers several years. I therefore went for i7 16 Gb memory and 1Tb SSD when I got my 2018 model. Yes I can upgrade the memory but nothing else hence going for the highest reasonable spec. I’m v pleased with it and with dual Dell 24 inch HD monitors it is great.
When I’ve thought about this I’ve prioritised spec in the following sequence (from most important to least):
Disk - as not upgradable.
Memory - as I don’t want to upgrade it.
My use would be as a server, with occasional “end user” use. So in my mind I’m also going with 512GB, 16GB, basic processor. Not sure about faster Ethernet and also not sure if I want data on an external disk (other than as backup).
For grins, as DrP was seduced by an iMac recently (maybe Pro but I wasn’t there so can’t tell), I’m thinking of an iMac as a possible alternative.
We’re definitely replacing a 2011 MacBook Pro 13” that is just used as a server now., But we also have a slightly younger 27” iMac that can’t pull the skin off a rice pudding. Consolidating makes some sense.
Like David Hamilton on the Mac Geek Gab podcast said last week: try to max out your cores if you can afford it. There’s no way to add another cpu later on.
You can upgrade the RAM yourself (well, sort of), add external ssd’s, but you can’t replace the cpu. And going for a smaller ssd, with external ssd’s added might even save you more than the $300 needed for the cpu bump.
So if future proofing is your goal, and have the extra $300 for an i7, I would really recommend adding tghe stronger cpu.
The question becomes whether the processor will become too slow (practically, because they don’t actually slow down) before Mac OS support is dropped. In terms of future proofing. And at more than $2,000 per machine future proofing is key to me.
I would recommend going for the i7. You can take only 8 GB RAM and put the money into the CPU. RAMs will get really cheap in 2019 and you can upgrade them anytime. You can also take 256 GB SSD, its twice as fast as the 128 GB SSD but only a little slower than the 512 GB SSD. And you can add super-fast external SSD.
I’m a new mac Mini owner as well, but I found this thread because I’m looking for an optical disc drive. I can’t seem to find any USB-C drives that don’t look like suspicious China-knock-offs. Let me know if you find something.
But unless you’re adding more physical cores, Apple’s CPU upgrades generally don’t increase performance much (and adding more cores only helps with multicore workflows). So while you’re stuck with what you get, getting a better CPU doesn’t necessarily get you meaningfully better performance.