I think it only works with Chrome or Chrome-based browsers that support access to local storage (e.g. Edge). So not Brave and (obviously) not Safari.
Oh, come on. Please lighten the proselytism, you may not be aware of it but you come across as pretty disdainful.
I used Roam way when it was fresh, way, way before it was paid. I actually still have my account and I can use it for free because I was grandfathered into my graphs.
I am still. Not. Using it. At all. And I never liked it even before I found out I didnât like its CEO.
Even if I did not have that account but I would still find it superior, I would pay for it, because it would be a professional expense and I am all for tools that allow for better thinking. I have gladly paid $100 for Obsidian even though I didnât have to.
Well, Roam is not worth a penny to me. It is not « better software ». Itâs very interesting software, it has brought to light many paradigms that are indeed changing the way we think and that supercharged the note-taking revolution we are seeing. For this, I will be always be grateful to this company.
But with Obsidian, I can do things with my local Markdown files in scripting, I have E2EE, reliable offline access, Roam does not provide any of that. Does it make a superior tool? For me, yes, because I care about that so much more than what Roam offers.
Itâs all well and good you found your Holy Grail with Roam. Great, happy for you. And, by all means, letâs talk about what makes which tool great. But â this is an age-old discussion in the field of tech â please recognize that your solution does not fit everyone, and trying to evangelize people saying « software A is so much better, you just havenât seen the light » is probably a waste of your own time and even, if youâre careless, a pretty reliable way to antagonize people.
The heck? Roam isnât a cult, but you canât actually explain why itâs good. People can only âget itâ by being able to get through the âlearning curveâ and by investing lots of money.
To make your implication clear, youâre saying that folks who use Roam are smarter (or at least more âwilling to learnâ) and richer than other folks.
This is the exact kind of malignant behaviour that other folks who use Roam find themselves apologizing for. And, again, itâs way off the mark from a discussion about the actual appsâŠ
Hmmm.
For what itâs worth, I can afford Roam and, recently sprang for a yearâs service. I like the free-flowing nature of it, but Iâm put off by the âweâll finish this app when we get around to itâ UX, and the âdonât mind the confusing help we provide â just browse YT for out-of-date videosâ support. And then I spent an afternoon (with Ryanâs excellent help) getting stuff out of Roam into Obsidian.
Iâm not getting rid of it, but it will fill a much narrower niche than I imagined.
You sound like a bigot to the Chinese, while still giving no evidence as to why Roam is better.
Translation: All people like innovative products. Some people are however smart enough to find innovative products that provide what they need without also requiring them to pay an arm and leg to use (let alone without taking their data away from them for the privilege to do so).
I rarely speak as such on this forum, but this now reminds me of the days of Usenet. It is time for the proverbial âplunkâ sound of someone who is being moved to the kill filter.
â
JJW
Dynalistâs/Obsidianâs devs are Canadian.
And before you get too high and mighty about copycat behaviours the benefits of competition, you might want to reconsider where Roam came from and where itâs going (Roam launched a command palette and settings menu just after this tweet).
Donald(?) is that you. Remember Twitter!
So, my messages now are being flagged, censored, and deleted because I think differently. But Roam is a cult, oh yeah. Sorry guys, but it is not possible to argue or to discuss a topic if you ban my answers when you donât like them. And I wonât allow this fascist attitude. End of the discussion for me here.
Wasnât much of a discussion anyways, you just kept spouting off that Roam was superior without really backing any of it up. I donât think anyone will miss your prejudiced posting around here.