Yeah. Tana appears to be the new new. Lots of PKM people talking about it. A few well-known Roam/Logseq/Obsidian users have jumped ship and are singing praises.
It hasn’t been easy and my journey is far from complete, but I’ve managed to stop being one of these people who chase apps and systems like they’ll solve all my issues. In fact, the more I’ve pared things down and simplified, the less stressed I’ve become over my “productivity”.
There seems to be an endless circle of people who feel the need to craft (pardon the pun) a 12 minute YouTube video on why they’re leaving an app or why another app holds so much more for them. These videos inevitably lead to a bunch of their viewers following suit, resulting in an abundance of articles and clips all over the web about why people are changing, how the future is so much better with another app etc.
I realized it’s not about keeping up to date with all the newest apps and “productivity” personalities on YouTube. It’s about finding a system that works for you and avoiding the temptation to needlessly overcomplicate things because it makes your system look cool or because you’re doing it the way (insert person name here) does it.
I’m there with you. Having fallen into this trap myself, I’ve pared down the apps I use, or even try, and I’m striving to stick with what is working well enough. I want to focus more on producing and less on “productivity,” as paradoxical as that sounds.
I watched the video, although not with an open mind because as soon as I saw the “glossy” promo start I was judging it I feel I’m starting to go against Silicon Valley’s shift here, because I don’t want one app that does everything moderately well (or poorly…). I like having different apps for different things (within reason). E.g. Why do I want my personal reading list in the same app as my work to-dos, meeting notes, projects, PKM, etc??
Anyway this comment is mostly irrelevant since it looks like your data is on their servers and I’m fundamentally opposed to that (although worth noting many employers would also not allow staff to keep work notes on a third party system).
The future of software seems so strange to me. It feels as though soon every new major desktop/laptop device will be like a Chromebook; hardware generally useful for accessing the Web and web apps, that’s it.
Isn’t it really the same idea if you think about it? There is a remote computer somewhere hosting your data while your computer just displays the result of some computation on a server manipulating that data.
But isn’t a chromebook closer to a time sharing computer than an MacBook Air for example? Nothing is stored on the chromebook except some browser cache files. All the power is in the Google data centers and the chromebook is a cheap laptop a student can afford. A mainframe of the 1970s was not affordable by any individual, but the terminals allowed several people to enjoy the power of that mainframe all at the same time.
Fundamentally I feel like there is a difference between data being hosted and served from servers that you have a degree of agency over and data that is hosted and served from servers where this agency is non-existent.
Complete physical ownership of a server or Co-location.
A rented dedicated server or a VPS with root access.
Shared access to a server like SDF or tilde.club where you only have control over the files in your directory.
Then you get to services like Google Drive, Dropbox, etc. where you have less control than the scenarios listed above. These services are comparable to shared Unix servers but the pathways of communication and relations with the administration are significantly narrower, hence agency diminishes.
I’m sure there are more cases or better descriptions, but this is the gist of what I meant.
Average users would likely not notice the “degrees of agency over their server” but would pay attention to the access pathway and user interface, whether it be a terminal client, a browser interface to the web, a locally running but cross-platform app, or a native desktop or mobile app. The server itself gets more and more hidden as you progress up this chain.
I was thinking in terms of control over your data and the marketing around it.As you point out in your reply, there’s more to this than just where the data’s stored and who can act on it.
My point is that you have to do a lot of unpicking of marketing euphemisms, disingenuous “commitments”, technobabble designed to obscure/deceive and some definite dishonesty to get a clear picture of the degree of agency you actually have.
Apart from dodgy privacy policies, the sort of thing I’m thinking of is providers who don’t act on customer instructions to delete their accounts/data. Or even simply providers who dot secure the data and allow it to be stolen.
I am on the waitlist so have not gotten to try it yet.
But based on this video Tana is enormously beyond just another notes program.
I have not wrapped my mind yet around whether it is an alternative to Filemaker or Excel or to low-code apps. For sure it is extremely customizable - but precisely how to characterize what you can build with it is not clear to me yet.