Here we go again censoring participation by small independent developers who interact with the Forum.
Why is this a problem?
Can we create a Developers section so those who are not interested can just not read it?
I can think of few things more useful on MPU than interacting directly with a developer.
If it were someone just leaving ads and not coming back I would get it - but if they are willing to engage and answer questions, why is that a problem?
I agree. Someone here was so angry, for no reason, to flag every single post that @MojoPad pad made, and to get rid of the dedicated thread I had suggested that the developer create. That’s unwarranted aggression.
It depends on the user’s trust level who flags a post as spam. If a “Regular” flags a post as spam, the post is hidden immediately. Then, a mod has to decide what to do with the flag (they are being notified). If no mod will act, the post will stay hidden. I am under the impression that this community seems to be on its own for quite some time now. And this is a problem in situations like this…
I agree - although we don’t want this forum to descend into a spam hole, I don’t believe every post should be flagged like that. Some discretion is needed where someone is actively engaging and it’s clear their intention is not just to gain more sales. We should be a more welcoming community
I can understand why it was flagged. The user joined the forum and posted their software. No prior engagement
Other users have been flagged for the same reason.
This is a difficult one to solve. Outlinersoftware forum allows this, but gets much less traffic than this forum.
People joining and promoting their software is certainly increasing. At what point will this make forum users lose interest? Once that happens it’ll be difficult to get users back.
Right, no prior engagement - but a ton of engagement in reply to the community. 9 replies above. If the logic is that we flag people who aren’t acting like part of the community, I’m not sure why we’d flag somebody who starts legitimately acting like part of the community.
I am bothered that a member of the community took it on their self to eject other members’ posts without a basis in community policy. I am bothered that we don’t have active moderators to, well, moderate. I’m bothered that the posts of @MojoPad, with whom I (and others) were conversing via the forum were deleted unapologetically, mid-conversation. And, finally, I’m bothered that whatever member decided to play traffic cop won’t own up to it, publicly.
The solution is simple: if you don’t like what a member says, mute the thread or mute the member from your view.
That does seem odd. I’ve always assumed that if community members are engaging with a new poster that their posts are acceptable. Flagging mid stream does seem a bit rude. And as others have said, if I don’t like a topic, I don’t read it.
Who is responsible for dealing with flagged posts? Surely they can unflag them?
Edit
Just looked at the moderators tab and only @beardfm and @MacSparky are moderators; along with the defunct Rosemary Orchard. They are the only one’s who can sort this. Perhaps they can also add a few more moderaters while they’re at it?