This is a fun post. Here is my methodology and my objectives. As a contrast to what I perceive from your description of your weekly review is that mine is much less journal-y (or reflective or introspective) and much more practically focused. Do not not take that as any kind of judgment about the merits of any weekly review approach; I’m just offering an observation that may help explain my system in light of what you described.
For me, the point of the weekly review is to make sure my system is all in order, that nothing is slipping through the cracks, and that I’m attending to the things that are important to me. I have my “review” broken into two major components that I do on different days. On Friday, I do all the inbox processing, collection, and filing type stuff. It’s a very mechanical process. On Saturday, I do the actual review.
My review itself is broken into four components (1) brainstorming (the mindsweep) about what things I need/want to be doing or maybe haven’t been doing that I should be doing; and then reviewing all the items that I’m waiting on others to complete, (2) analyzing my calendar (I go two weeks back for review and three weeks forward for planning), (3) reviewing my next actions by quickly scanning through all my contexts (or tags, as they are now called in OmniFocus) to see if there are things I did but forgot to check off or things I need to do that should be prioritized, and lastly (4) I review my projects list to see if there are any projects that are stalled, need adjustments, or the like. In this last phase, I also spend a little extra time on my work projects – which for me are my cases. So, I’ll read through all the litigation plans and calendars for my cases to evaluate what things I should be prioritizing during the week.
Now, keep in mind that this is just my methodology. I’m not perfect at it, and I don’t always have the time I need to do it thoroughly. But what I’ve found is that just doing what I can–even if it’s 10 minutes on some weeks–tasks do not slip through the cracks, projects get done, and I don’t have to worry that I’m neglecting anything that ought not to be neglected. The process, for me, is very freeing.
Some other items that are in the typical GTD weekly review, I’ve moved to a once-a-month review. For example, my someday/maybes. I look at those once a month. My goals, habits, and other big-picture things also go on my once-a-month review.
Some things that I do that are like yours: I put things like “be more understanding with the kids” in my system with a daily repeat for a while when I’m trying to build a new habit or improve some behavior. I have a special context for that so it does not crowd out the work that I need to do. I also have a context for things that can’t be done in one setting but that I need to work on. I call that one “move it forward” or “MIF.” I agree that those things are not strict GTD Next Actions, but having a reminder of something that is not a task per se has been helpful. For me, though, if I leave them in place too long they just become noise. I use them sparingly, and review them during my weekly review.
My overall approach to all of this “stuff,” is to make sure I have all the things I have to/want to do recorded in a single place where they won’t be forgotten and that is designed to remind me of them when I’m best able to act them. That is the central point of GTD, anyway. I guess I’m not expressing anything new there. My take away: If you work your review to ensure that you are examining your inventory against your priorities, your review is doing everything it should do for you.