What an AI Agent Accomplished in Hours That Would Have Taken Me Weeks

I recently completed a large-scale file reorganization project with the assistance of Claude. The experience is worth sharing for anyone considering similar work.

The Problem

For years, my documents had accumulated inside iCloud Drive’s application-specific containers, each app maintaining its own folder hierarchy entirely separate from every other app. Files lived under iCloud/Pages, iCloud/Keynote, iCloud/Numbers, iCloud/iA Writer, iCloud/MindNode, iCloud/OmniOutliner, and similar locations. Finding a document required remembering which application had created it. Searching across topics was practically impossible because related files were siloed by tool rather than organized by subject. Moving to a new device, switching applications, or locating something from a mobile device was far harder than it should have been.

The goal was to move every file out of those application containers and into a single, unified Documents folder organized by topic and purpose, a structure that would remain coherent regardless of which application created or opened a given file.

A secondary goal was to ensure that my files were being backed up. Like many in this forum, I discovered to my chagrin that BackBlaze was not backing up files stored in iCloud. :rage: That discovery alone required moving the files and transitioning to a different backup service.

What the Work Actually Required

Before any file could be moved, I consolidated the source material. The application folders, Pages alone contained thousands of files, were copied into a staging folder (00 Source) so the work could proceed while the originals remained protected. The destination organizational structure had to be designed from scratch: seventeen numbered topic folders, each containing format-named subfolders along with asset folders for images, video, audio, and ZIP files.

Across all the application folders, there were more than 18,500 raw files to process. According to Claude, the project involved 3,109 distinct logical items spanning eighteen file types across seventeen destination folders. Every file had to be examined to determine its correct destination, moved to the appropriate topic and format subfolder, and verified. Beyond moving files, the work required identifying format violations, converting legacy plain-text files to Markdown, consolidating scattered blog content under a unified folder so that iA Writer could treat it as a single library, and creating asset folders throughout.

At a conservative estimate of two minutes per logical item, the manual work would have required roughly one hundred hours. At three minutes per item, it would have exceeded one hundred fifty hours. That estimate does not account for designing the seventeen-folder structure, creating every destination subfolder, running verification passes, correcting mistakes, handling the blog consolidation, or producing a final inventory. A realistic estimate would approach several full work weeks. I believe it. In fact, the prospect was so daunting that I would not have undertaken it on my own. I would have simply copied my existing structure from iCloud into the Documents folder and been left with the same inefficient arrangement I had started with.

What Claude Did

Over approximately twenty-four hours spread across two days, with my active supervision and direction, Claude designed and built the entire destination folder structure, wrote and executed all the scripts to copy and move files into their correct locations, ran multiple compliance scans to identify format violations and misplaced items, corrected every violation it found, consolidated the blog’s Markdown content under a unified parent folder, created asset folders wherever needed, and converted all legacy plain-text files to Markdown. When I identified problems, and there were several, from Finder screenshots, Claude diagnosed the root cause, corrected its logic, and re-verified. When its first approach to the blog consolidation produced an incorrect result, it revised the method until the structure was exactly right.

This is a fitting illustration of President Reagan’s maxim: trust, but verify.

At the conclusion of the project, Claude produced a two-sheet Excel manifest: a Summary tab showing file counts by folder and file type, and a complete File Manifest tab with one row per logical item, recording the destination folder, topic subfolder, format folder, file type, extension, filename, and relative path. That manifest now serves as the authoritative inventory before I remove the original application containers from iCloud.

The Benefit

The reorganized structure is application-agnostic. Files are grouped by subject and purpose rather than by the tool that created them. Any application on any device can locate what it needs. Related files from different applications now sit in the same topic folder. The iA Writer library reflects my actual editorial categories. And when I am ready to delete the original application-specific containers, I have a verified manifest confirming that every file was accounted for and correctly placed.

This was not a project I would have completed on my own. The volume made it impractical, and the tedium would have guaranteed errors and would have driven me crazy!:crazy_face: What Claude accomplished in a matter of hours, with my supervision and oversight throughout, would have represented weeks of careful, painstaking work. For anyone managing a large, disorganized file library across multiple applications, this kind of AI-assisted reorganization deserves serious consideration.

The donkey completed its work, but proved stubborn at times. :slightly_smiling_face:

2 Likes

And what did you gain from all that Claude activity that you wouldn’t gain by using a good quality search app such as FoxTrot, or even Houdah Spot or Spotlight.

Other than feeling gratified by neatness and order – which is a good but minor virtue IMO – I care little that my drives and cloud accounts are either ordered by apps, or generally out of order. Because I know I have the tools to find whatever I want to find when I need it.

Katie

3 Likes

You already use DEVONthink you could’ve just index the folder locations and it would have revealed in searches

3 Likes

I agree that neatness and order may be a minor virtue, but given my OCD inclinations about neatness, it is a minor virtue with a big impact. :slightly_smiling_face:

The project was not discretionary. As I noted in the original post, I discovered that Backblaze was not backing up files stored in iCloud’s application containers. The files had to be moved regardless of organizational preference. That necessity provided the opportunity to replace an overly complex structure with something coherent.

Search is excellent for locating a known document, and I use it regularly. But much of my work falls into topics, departments, and venues involving serial content: a devotional series spanning several months or more, complex annual board reports, conference presentations organized by event, and blog articles in various stages of draft and publication. A search window returns results for a query. It does not show me what is missing from a series, what has already been addressed in a body of work, or how documents in different formats relate to one another.

The deeper issue is that I am frequently not searching for a single file. I am assembling large numbers of files in different formats for larger projects. A multi-year strategic plan, for example, draws on national trend research, local demographic data, internal assessments, accreditation findings, board directives, a SWOT assessment, focus group findings, and more. That material must be consolidated so that gaps and connections are visible at a glance, not retrieved piecemeal through repeated searches. A well-organized folder structure reveals context, sequence, and scope in ways a search window cannot.

There is also a practical concern that search alone does not address. When files are siloed by application, every device and every app sees only its own container. A topic-based structure is application-agnostic: any tool on any device can find what it needs, and related files from Pages, Keynote, Markdown, and Numbers sit together rather than in four separate locations.

I appreciate that habits, needs, and inclinations differ. For my purposes, this arrangement serves far better than what I had. I am glad Claude was available to assist with the project.

1 Like

My OCD loves this but would find the process overwhelming at the current time. I’ve always sorted files into named folders in Dropbox. After 28 years of university life, I’m now retired and would like to whittle now-defunct folders into summaries of what is contained. I have a Claude account and hoping to use that to accomplish the task.

I would like to do the same for email. Eventually I want Devonthink to index everything, but would like to get rid of the non-essential first.

I would have as well, but Claude Cowork made the task tolerable. As to whether the effort is worth it will depend a great deal on the practical and psychological needs of an individual. For me, both needs were met by going through the ordeal. :slightly_smiling_face:

Well done @Bmosbacker! There are many posts appearing of what people are achieving with AI.

I do think this raises a slightly broader issue with AI. Technology brings changes, but we often apply them to old paradigms. I read a report years ago that stated when businesses adopted computers wholesale little productivity gains were seen, but all the reports where now formatted with pie charts. What had been a typewriter produced report was now a colour printed report. The same information, but it looked a whole lot nicer. However, it didn’t actually add any real value.

We are in the early stages of AI where lots can be done, but the real question is should it be done? AI is creating images and videos that don’t really add any value, but just look good. The impact of AI data centers is increasing global warming, plus cost increases in many sectors like computer chips and RAM. I think the world is not in a position yet to use AI responsibly and AI corporations are only looking for profit.

I’m concerned that AI will use up finite resources and do irreversible environmental damage if left unchecked.

This is by no means intended to be a criticism of this thread or others like it (I’ve used AI in similar ways myself!), but I’m beginning to ask questions about whether I’m being a responsible AI user as I begin to understand the impact this technology has and ask if anyone else has had similar thoughts on this forum?

1 Like

I share some of your concerns, @svsmailus. But I think the future still holds promise for many of our AI/LLM workflows being performed 100% locally. Macs in particular are becoming more and more capable of handling AI inference workloads using open-source or open-weight models. So there might be a day soon when many of us are far less dependent on Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI for our AI, all of whom require vast compute and energy resources to run their frontier models.

1 Like

The die was cast in 2017 when “Attention is all you Need” was published. AI is in the world. But the amount of compute available may start limiting some of the big players. If so, it might give regulators, etc. a chance to catch up a bit.