Meeter and their successor product are neat little utilities.
Whatās the successor product?
Meeter and their successor product are neat little utilities.
Whatās the successor product?
Price increase aside, I love this announcement:
āThereās inflation, weāre raising prices. Cancel or donāt, up to you. ā
Saves us from the āitās only the cost of a 7.52 oz latte every 1.68 days!ā
Well, thatās it for me then. I used Fantastical mainly for some minor features like being able to hide single events (I use lots of shared calendars from colleagues which include stuff not relevant for me.)
I contemplated cancelling my sub twice, but ended up renewing mainly because I liked the UI of Fantastical better than BusyCal. But aesthetics alone is not worth it with the 40% price increase for me. I just bought a $8 BusyCal license in their Black Friday bundle deal and migrated my Mac. So far so good!
I agree with this. Itās very much to the point which feels refreshing.
Maybe a neutral announcement results in a more neutral response and not everybody getting angry at them?
(So far most responses I found on Social Media were equally neutral comments of people evaluating whether they stay on Fantastical or move to BusyCal / Apple Calendar etc.)
Bardeenāitās a more general tool but tried to solve the same problem as Meeter (prepping for meetings and being on time to meetings being inconvenient.)
I am a Fantastical user. I could get by just with the stock calendar app, but I am very happy to see how Flexibits does make use of everything Apple has to offer:
And much more stuffā¦
Only a few days ago most of us noticed Appleās App Store Awards over here and here and commented that they were more like āmehā. I felt the same to some degree.
What we are experiencing right now is that the market for software is changing - again. @WayneG has has mentioned it above: there once was a time when software did cost a fortune. That has gone way down to a point where software started to be called āappsā - it was the advent of the App Stores. And everybody tried a concept where software had to be dirt cheap or even āfreeā. That can work for open source projects with a striving community of developers, but commercial products being sold by developers that want to make a living off their apps need to earn real money and they need to find a niche in the market for it to be sustainable.
As @Jeremy has phrased it in his own words, Flexibits has made a decision: make apps that are of value and sell them at a price Flexibits considers to be adequate. It is the customersā decision if the price is ok given their individual needs or not.
It took me some time, but I am back in my personal pre App Store period when I did not need every app only because it was the new and shiny one. I am absolutely ok and even happy to pay the price for an app if it is worth it to me. That is something that can and does change all the time. Appleās Reminders app is the perfect example for that. I switched back to Appleās Reminders after having been a Things and OmniFocus user for years (not simultaneously of course). Why? Because I got to the conclusion that my GTD needs are more than fulfilled in the stock app in 2022. And I am perfectly aware of the fact that there are a lot of users that will come to a different conclusion.
I have paid the yearly subscription fee back in September. I will think about it in August 2023, if I am willing to pay the new price or not. Right now I am undecided, because I am definitely no calendar power user (but then again I am someone who likes Fantastical so much that I already have come back twice to use it after abandoning it). But I totally get what Flexibits is doing and why they are heading this direction. I guess we all have to learn again just to make our own individual cost-benefit analysis for software (at least that is what I have to learn again). I have to admit that I maybe was too lax in that matter in the last decade when it comes down to āappsā. Why? Because a lot of apps were sold at prices so low that they were āno-brainersā just because of their price, not necessarily because of their value/features. That is not sustainable in the long run. Neither for the developer, nor for the customer.
Darn it. I forgot about the Fantastical watch complication, which is miles better than the stock calendarās app.
But I agree with your analysis for the most part. Good software has been underpriced for a long time, because the pool of potential new users has remained large and growing with iPhone adoption. But the market is more crowded, and there arenāt that many more customers coming into the market. A sustainable business model has to acknowledge this ā the rapid growth days are over for most app categories.
I just renewed in September so Iāve got a while to think about it. Seems awfully pricy for a calendar app - a calendar app I have to sign into twice a week because of my workās Office 365 setup.
That said, having reminders and calendar mixed together is handy. For me, I donāt like all my dayās tasks lumped into my day, but those little ādonāt forget to do this at time Aā are helpful.
I know other apps do the reminders/cal thing but I donāt love their design and flow eg (Calendars 5). I do have a grandfathered Moleskine Timepage account so itās free ā I may revisit that again.
Iāve cancelled 7 software subscriptions this year and more are likely to follow. Here in the UK energy prices have gone nuts and Iām paying an extra Ā£150 per month now.
I think app developers should think long and hard before raising their prices in the current financial climate. Especially when stock apps will cover what youāre offering. Maybe they wonāt do it as well, but if itās for free, itās hard to beat.
OTOH this might be a good time for developers to learn if their current business model is sustainable. And for the rest of us to learn how much our technology is going to cost going forward.
I voice with those that believe all-things-subscription are unsustainable for consumers. If every single app we used was rented out, we would spend hundreds of dollars a month and still own nothing - not even our own data.
I, for one, support developers that offer alternative licensing. Let me buy and own a product. I may or may not choose to upgrade to v22 next year, but be decent enough to let me continue using the app I paid for, for however long it continues to function. Apple is to primarily blame here given they donāt support paid upgrades on the mac app store and seemingly reward apps that charge a subscription by lowering their commission on year 2+. Bleh.
The new Weather app in iOS 16, iPad OS16 and Ventura is a good example of a stock app doing just about everything you need. Why purchase third party weather apps like the insipid and annoying Carrot Weather when the stock app does such a good job?
Iāve been an enthusiastic Fantastical user for years and was happy to pay the previous subscription.
However, this price increase is too much for what I get out of Fantastical now. Itās clear that theyāre moving to support a work style that is not how I work (collaboration, complicated scheduling/invitations, etc.), and it seems like thatās where all innovation is going.
Since my subscription is up in February, Iāve set up a test of BusyCal. On the Mac it seems like it does everything I want that Appleās Calendar does not.
I have two problems yet to solve: the iPhone and Watch. I time-block my days, so I was using widgets extensively to show my calendar.
I can live without the Watch complication. It was nice, but Infograph is the only place itās useful, and Apple is clearly not updating that kind of view.
Iām more worried about the iPhone. I love my large, black-background calendar list widget. I find it much more attractive than Appleās ā it shows more information in a much more elegant layout. But I guess Iāve got a few months to sort it out.
I use this stock app exclusively and youāre right, you have to go back and manually add location data into your appointments - at least thatās what Iāve always done - so yeah thatās a bit cumbersome, but Iāve never needed a faster input method that warranted paying a subscription, as is the case with Fantastical.
Adding locations isnāt too bad ā at least, you can do it all from the keyboard on the Mac.
When the preview (or whatever itās called) pops up after you hit return on a Quick Event, you can tab to the location field and start typing. It pulls from your contacts, I believe, and starts to match it. Using the arrow keys you can select a location, then hit enter to add it to the event.
This is essentially what I did with Fantastical, too, because I found that it often wasnāt smart enough to match correctly.
If the stock app would let you scroll through events in that view with the month calendar at the top and the event list at the bottom - it might be workable for me. As is, the combination of all grey dots and a non-scrollable list in that view make it a non starter for me.
Yeah, you can scroll events in the list view, but I want the calendar there too.
Same for me. I held off on subscribing until a month agoā¦ now a $17 for next year? Back to Saisuke for me I guess.
This is exactly how I use my calendar too and is what keeps me on Fantastical. Having been a Fantastical user sinceā¦(checking receipts)ā¦v1 in 2012, going through my calendar in any other way on an iPhone just seems unbearably clunky.
I am using Fantastical, too. And I donāt see at the moment, that this will be changed, with the next payment coming due.
BUT I at the same time āhateā Cardhop! It is a pain in the ass for me. It is slow, clumsy and unreliable.
I would really appreciate, it those two Apps would have been separated, and therefore the subscription for Fantastical only, lowered by the amount eaten up by Cardhop.
Thatās the thing; you donāt need every single app.